Utilitarianism And Consequentialism - 758 Words

Consequentialism is determining whether actions are justified based on the consequences of the action. Singer’s approach of utilitarianism, a form of consequentialism, is deepened by arguing that the consequences of the action for all life that is able to perceive pleasure or pain must be taken into account in determining whether the action is right or wrong. Deontology takes a different approach to how actions are determined just. According to Regan’s view, an action is not considered right or wrong based on the consequence of the action, but on the action itself, referring to â€Å"moral rules and duties† (p.29). Regan focuses on the intrinsic value that pertains to animals and argues that since they have intrinsic value it is morally wrong†¦show more content†¦The whale faces tremendous pain during its time of death. The killing of a whale does not maximize human satisfaction. Instead, it brings forth slight satisfaction through the use of whale products. Although it does give economic gains to various people involved, other occupancies gain a far greater net worth than whaling. Whale meat used for human consumption has had a declining demand since it is competing with other products such as beef, chicken, pork, and fish. The unwanted whale meat is transferred to sit in freezers, accumulating expenses for the space and refrigeration in use. In the cosmetic industry, whale oil is not a need. Although some companies still use whale oil in their products, most companies have found alternate resources such beeswax, olive oil, cocoa butter, etc. The benefits of whaling are various but ranked low in accordance to satisfaction. The whales suffering can be described as torture since its death is not quick and humane, ranking its pain on a high scale. The net suffering of the whale outweighs the human sat isfaction of whaling. Therefore, according to utilitarianism, whaling is morally wrong. A deontologist will differ from the utilitarian view on the basis that the act of killing a whale is morally wrong due to the whale’s intrinsic value and not due to the consequences. But if society were to comply to deontologist views and value all naturalShow MoreRelatedThe Consequentialist Theory Of Monsters952 Words   |  4 Pagesapplied in Monsters Inc. The Consequentialism-utilitarianism method looks at determining if act is right or wrong. It is determined consequential because it does not look at characteristics of how the act was performed but only on the final product. Act utility determines that if an act is ethically right if it maximizes utility. Consequentialism-Utilitarianism is signified in this movie because of what is at stake for the monsters. In Consequentialism-Utilitarianism the choice for every action isRead MoreConsequentialism And Consequentialism : Virtue Ethics, Consequentialism, And Deontology1200 Words   |  5 Pagesframeworks: virtue ethics, consequentialism, and deontology. In this essay, I will more concentrate on consequentialism, especially utilitarianism, and deontology to make compare and contrast analysis of each other and how each case works differently and causes divergent result in the same scenario. Both consequentialism and deontology is underlying the action-based theory, a traditional approach to focus totally on the actions that performed by one. Although both consequentialism and deontology is underRead MoreUtilitarianism, Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism1565 Words   |  7 PagesUtilitarianism has some positive aspects and some problems within the theory, like any theory. There are ways to try to improve it by creating act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. J.J.C. Smart of La Trobe University evaluates the difference between the two and their inevitability. He also inspects how consequentialism is going to hurt the theory of utilitarianism. Also, Rawls is going to propose a solution to this problem. His theory, Justice as Fairness, seeks to have everyone be seen asRead MoreTo Apply The Moral Theory To Janice’S Case, We Must Consider1556 Words   |  7 Pagesmuch more overall pain for all of the actors involved. In Classical Act Utilitarianism, because actions that produce as much utility as any other are obligatory, the physician is obligated to end Janice’s life. This ultimate conclusion is incredibly strong—too strong perhaps for some to conclude that Act Utilitarianism came up with the right verdict. An alternative is Rule Consequentialism. The basic idea of Rule Consequentialism is that what is morally right is based on how the action stands to anRead MoreUtilitarianism and Euthanasia1031 Words   |  5 Pagespeace instead of suffering in pain. Jeremy Bentham, founder of Utilitarianism. Actions are good/bad, right/wrong based on whether or not they will produce pleasure or pain for the party or parties involved. It is basically saying that the principle of utilitarianism is always chooose the action or social policy that provides the most happiness for all. Utilitarianism comes with three implications of the principle of utilitarianism; We should always seek the greatest good for the greatest numberRead MoreConsequentialism, Non- Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics1742 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction This essay will provide a theoretical understanding of the four ethical frameworks: Consequentialism, Non- Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics. When applied to a situation these frameworks help teachers to resolve and justify their decision making. The objective is to apply the four frameworks to the scenario Helping Molly, to establish the most ethical course of action. Finally, a recommended course of action will be justification. The overarching ethical issue presentRead MoreUse Of Consequentialism, Desire Satisfaction Theory And Objective List Theory1345 Words   |  6 PagesConsequentialism is an approach to Ethics that argues that the morality of an action is reliant on the action s consequence (Mastin, 2008). This theory is based on two main principles, first, that the rightness or wrongness of an act depends solely on the results of it and secondly, that the better act is the one that produces more good as a consequence. What is meant by consequence here is ev erything that a certain action brings about, including the action itself. The good end required by an actionRead MoreEthics : Ethics And Ethics1468 Words   |  6 Pagesschools of thought, and each differentiate through moral intentions. Consequentialism relies on the consequences of an action in order to distinguish whether or not something is morally acceptable. Deontology considers the morality of an action by one’s reason for doing a certain deed. Lastly, virtue ethics bases morality off of virtuous character, and how a virtuous person would act given a certain predicament. Ultimately, consequentialism provides the most practical explanation for morality due to theRead MoreConsequentialism And Its Effects On The Greatest Happiness Principle1527 Words   |  7 PagesConsequentialism is a belief that was formed in an attempt to determine what actions are right or wrong. It is the view that an action is considered to be morally right if it produces better consequences than any other available action would have produced. For example, take into consideration someone debating the morally right action when confronted with the decision of whether to study for a test or whether to go to a movie. According to Consequentialism, studying for a test would be the morallyRead MoreParable of the Sadhu Essay827 Words   |  4 Pagesa decision, those being consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics. The essay does not clearly indicate which method was used to assess the situation. In my opinion, the best method would be Kantian deontology. Let us discuss consequentialism first. Consequentialism focuses on consequences as the most important factor in the decision making process (Donaldson 3). For consequentialists the motives of an act are not as important as what comes out of it. Utilitarianism is one of the branches